Hey all, Ernie here with a fresh coat of paint on a piece dating all the way back to 2016. This one discusses the unusual dynamic of the newspaper industry during the earliest days of online services and how quick they were to give away the golden goose. Read on!
Today in Tedium: Publishing words on a computer is not a difficult task these days. We have so many options to write words and distribute them through a computerized interface that we take the whole process for granted. (You probably published something in the time it took you to read the previous two sentences.) But there was a time when publishing through a computer was painful, cumbersome, and expensive. It also had little in common with the free-for-all that allows for the creation of all sorts of terrible/fascinating content online by random folks using platforms like Medium and Substack. Today, Tedium tracks all the scraps of journalism and tells a story about the earliest days of online news, when the modems used acoustic couplers and it cost a bajillion dollars a minute to read a news story on a computer. — Ernie @ Tedium
It’s like Netflix for Mac apps: If you’re the kind of person who likes trying out new programs to see what sticks, try SetApp, a Netflix-style “app store” for Mac programs. It’s cheap—just $9.99 a month—and it’ll be a huge boon to your productivity. Check it out!
“We believe that this project will lead to enhancements in the content of the magazine. It will keep us in closer touch with the interests of our readers and will help us learn the best ways to use electronic communications in conjunction with our traditional print publication. We’ll let you know about new developments in this area as soon as we can.”
— A message in BYTE Magazine’s October 1984 issue, announcing the launch of BYTEnet, which eventually became the BYTE Information eXchange (BIX). The network may have been the most ambitious online effort by a media outlet in the days before AOL and Prodigy made it easy. The magazine’s writers, including “Computing at Chaos Manor” columnist Jerry Pournelle, visited BIX often, sometimes contributing content unique to the network. (Side note: Jerry Pournelle, who was also a famous science fiction author, was pretty much the most awesome human being who ever lived. He died in 2017 and was perhaps the first blogger . I wrote an obit for him here.)
Five notable developments in the history of publishing stuff on computers
- In 1969, The New York Times released its first online article database, which it called the New York Times Information Bank, or InfoBank. The tool offered access to stories from both the complete Times collection and selected archive materials from 60 other publications. “The Information Bank has been developed with the end user specifically in mind; every effort has been made to bridge the gap between the world of automated information systems and the student, business executive, government official or other information seeker,” wrote Sally Bachelder, the marketing representative of the database product, in an academic journal article. If you ever wondered by the Times′ online database was so much better than every other newspaper’s, this is why.
- In 1970, a computer terminal in Columbia, South Carolina, sent an Associated Press story to another terminal in Atlanta. This, according to Poynter, was the first time a computer terminal was used to write, edit, and publish a story in full.
- In 1974, the British Broadcasting Service started Ceefax, the first teletext-based information service to go into wide use. This service, which was shown on television during the dead of night and accessible on British TV sets, proved popular enough that competing television networks created their own versions of Ceefax. It was in constant operation for nearly 40 years, until the shutoff of BBC’s analog television signal in 2012. Here was the final broadcast.
- Also in 1974, Dow Jones launched an online information service, built around its Wall Street Journal, that was designed specifically for investors, rather than researchers. The service, accordingly, didn’t have a lot of archival material, and instead was designed to offer up-to-the-minute financial news—news that cost a pretty penny and was sold on a contract basis to investors.
- In 1993, AOL released its RAINMAN markup language for building screens and content in its proprietary interface. This tool, created by two of AOL’s cofounders, effectively was one of the first content management systems that went into wide use—in other words, the WordPress of the ’90s. Not that a lot of people knew about it way back when—heavily moderated by non-disclosure agreements, it only really became publicly known after a community of AOL hackers came about.
“We do think that it provides us with an excellent means to supplement the daily newspaper, by providing readers with updated information, after they receive their paper, throughout the day, so that any time during the day that a reader wants the latest story, the latest bit of information on a particular item, all they have to do is dial into the CompuServe service.”
— Bob Johnson, vice president of the Columbus Dispatch, discussing (in a 1980 interview) why he felt the online version of the Dispatch, which was being tested on CompuServe that year, wouldn’t compete with the print product. The Dispatch was the first newspaper to go online—partly a hometown-pride play on the part of the Columbus, Ohio-based CompuServe—and it was far from the last.
How CompuServe convinced the country’s largest newspapers to put their stories on its service
The Columbus Dispatch’s early experiments with CompuServe were no accident.
They came about in part to some savvy discussions on the part of CompuServe’s cofounder and early CEO, Jeff Wilkins.
The firm, which got its start in 1969 as a computer time-sharing firm targeted at large companies, slowly evolved into a consumer-targeted service that offered different kinds of online software to end users. One of those software ideas was searchable news, something that Wilkins championed as a larger concept.
In an interview for the podcast Conquering Columbus Wilkins noted that the firm wanted to get the Associated Press, which had previously only been available to the public through dead trees, onto its service. Wilkins first approached the Dispatch, talking them into giving the online service a test feed to try things out.
Eventually, Wilkins reached out to the Associated Press directly, traveling to New York to show the concept to AP officials, who then brought the idea in front of the board of the American Newspaper Publishers Association (ANPA). The board, which got a gander of the concept at a meeting in Hawaii, proved so intrigued by what they were shown that members of the board, including Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham and New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, decided to made a special trip to Columbus to meet with CompuServe in person.
Wilkins, who had initially wanted to pay for a direct AP feed, managed to flip the script: He asked for the association to let him have access to the feeds of 10 large papers for a test, in exchange for $250,000 in free advertising from each paper. ANPA not only agreed to that deal, but said it would be willing to get each of its member papers on board as part of an ongoing test of the service—one that, in the end, would last approximately two years.
“So, we ended up with every big newspaper in the United States,” he said in the podcast.
It may have been the greatest negotiation in business history. Put in a room with the most powerful publishers in the newspaper industry, CompuServe’s executives managed to convince the AP’s members to give away their copy for free—all by portraying it as an experiment.
“Oh, it was beyond our wildest dreams, all I could do to stop from keep from jumping up and down,” he added.
Alas, the idea proved more successful in theory than in execution. According to the 2008 book, On the Way to the Web: The Secret History of the Internet and Its Founders, the experiment ended with something of a thud, with just 10 percent of CompuServe’s users regularly using the platform and outside beta testers complaining about the lack of photos. (And those users weren’t even paying $5 an hour!)
Additionally, questions quickly arose about whether services like CompuServe would endanger the golden goose:
The test brought out quite a bit of data about online demographics and reading habits. Most users were males in their thirties, with decent incomes. They logged on for email, news, shopping, gaming, banking, and so on. But newspaper publishers weren’t as interested in these things as they were in assurances that online services were no threat to newspapers and their advertising base. They got that assurance from AP spokesman Larry Blasko, who told them, “There is no danger to the American newspaper industry from electronic delivery of information to the home.”
Newspapers had survived radio. They had survived television. According to ANPA, they would survive computer networks.
The amount that the newspaper company Knight-Ridder spent on Viewtron over its three-year lifespan. The initiative, which was an effort to bring a Ceefax-style videotex system to the United States, failed pretty hard, garnering just 20,000 subscribers at a time when other online networks were seeing massive growth, and failing to go national. Its model was a clear inspiration for AOL and Prodigy, however. Oh, and WebTV.
As we all know about the modern internet, the news industry’s relationship with the series of tubes is mutually beneficial. Sure, the news wires throw out a bunch of stuff on the internet, but the internet often is a great source for news fodder.
And back in 1983, CompuServe gave back to the news wires in a big way. One of the service’s earliest prominent users, Christopher Dunn (or CHRISDOS), had met the love of his life, Pamela Jensen (or Zebra3), through the service’s chat lines, known at the time as CB Simulator.
Eventually, their story got picked up by the Chicago Tribune, which created a bit of a media sensation. The public was introduced by CHRISDOS and Zebra3 to the idea of online dating, and the couple ended up getting married, even showing up on Donahue at one point.
“If it weren’t for the way we met, I think we could just be any other 25-years-married couple,” Dunn told the Tribune in a 2008 retrospective story. “I’ve always adored her. She adores me. It’s very easy to love my wife, I guess that’s just the way I am.”
It was just the first of many viral news stories that the online news machine would swallow up and turn into content. But it may be perhaps one of the most heartwarming.
Find this one an interesting read? Share it with a pal! See ya Friday!